and then Boeing immediately created a short field enhancement package for the 737NG and they solved the problem
2 Likes
A319 has better high altitude performance than 737-700
Because of the higher thrust
But y’know, couldn’t they have done that in the first place?
A320 has no short field performance
Really
1 Like
why would they do it for all?
If your an airline like United, flying your 737s from Chicago, Newark, Washington, Los Angeles to Phoenix, Seattle, Orlando, and Dallas, do you really need it? That’s just unnecessary costs
1 Like
A320 also has one
only the NEO has
2 Likes
Yes, and less powerful engines too!
2 Likes
Well, by that logic the 777 is a far superior aircraft compared to the A350
3 Likes
Actually, compared to ANY aircraft
1 Like
777 is best aircraft confirmed
2 Likes
so Boeing is the best manufacturer. Case closed!
3 Likes
Turns out only the A321neo has more powerful engines… Airbus fanboys as always spreading lies…
Boeing, yet again, superior (except when compared to the A321neo) in that “logic”
1 Like
No, if they choose to derate MAX thrust to minimum the A320neo also beats it
But depends on the airline
1 Like
blah blah blah excuse excuse excuse JUST ADMIT DEFEAT lol
2 Likes
I AM STATING FACTS
1 Like
Unless you say wiki is lying
1 Like
like… literally going against the data in Wikipedia?