Yeah so without it, it would be like the 739
1 Like
Good luck with taking off
1 Like
ASA flies them there 
1 Like
Hi guys
2 Likes
There must be quite a big weight restriction then
1 Like
Hello
Hola
Bonjour
Olá
1 Like
Probably
Plus they don’t have to climb as fast as SNA
1 Like
But the landing… That runway is really short
1 Like
Idk
They get it
SNA could too if they had regular takeoffs 
1 Like
Plus I don’t think IF is very accurate with the stopping ability. It’s probably better IRL
1 Like
Those airliners.net guys also agree with the fact that the 739 has horrible runway performance
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.airliners.net/forum/viewtopic.php%3Ft%3D603131&ved=2ahUKEwjBvv3nzdnxAhWBi1wKHbLsBBcQFjAAegQIAxAC&usg=AOvVaw0NCAne8j0dwOWgH9yXGG0Y&cshid=1625958074895
1 Like
Ok
Still a good plane
1 Like
Yes a good underpowered plane
1 Like
BUR gets JB A321 to JFK
1 Like
More. Powerful.
110-120kN thrust vs 133-142kN thrust
Source - Wikipedia
1 Like
Yeah but the weight restrictions
1 Like
But say, if you had a 739 and A321 at the same weight, the A321 would get off the runway quicker than the 739 would.
1 Like
And the 757 could beat both at a heavier weight
1 Like
(Assuming both TOGA)
1 Like
we’re not talking abt the 757
1 Like