Which manufacturer do you think will dominate this decade?

Aviation Games Debating
43

Don’t you love when Airbus takes credit for an aircraft they had nothing to do with?
Really angers me when no ones seems to care Bombardier designed and made that aircraft

1 Like
44

yes
Credit stealing

1 Like
45

Here’s what Boeing really needs:

  1. NMA.
  2. 737 MAX fiasco to fully dissolve.
  3. MAX 10 deliveries.
  4. Order from SWA for MAX 7 aircraft.
1 Like
46

Ikr! The 757 is a beast and there’s nothing that can realistically replace it yet. Even a clean sheet NMA like they proposed (which from what it looks like will just be a mini 787), most likely won’t be able to fully replace it.

2 Likes
47

More efficient engines. Literally all that has to happen. Plus newer wings ig. That’s not compromising like the MAX was to the airframe

1 Like
48

yes and i have an idea that might help boeing… :thinking:

49

The 737MAX10 has the least range tho. It can really only fly transcon
Kinda pointless. And I like Boeing

1 Like
50

cant do what the 757 did and does

1 Like
51

Correct. However, they need this aircraft to meet the gap if there is no NMA. Or, to help fill the gap for aging 757s.

1 Like
52

I have no idea what idiots design planes today, but it used to be that the range wasn’t affected too much by a larger variant, or the larger variant actually had more range. Doesn’t seem to be the case anymore

1 Like
53

Here is what Boeing needs to do in this decade to get on top:

  1. Full MAX recertification around the world
  2. NMA, launch and produce
  3. Receive bulk orders based around the NMA

All of this above should happen by around 2025

  1. Launch FSA, size of A223, but better
  2. Prepare to stretch the FSA to fill the MAX gap (a -8 and -9)
  3. Finally, 787-X
1 Like
54

Or make the 757-9

1 Like
55

why are you so correct here?!

1 Like
56

Or make the 757-9

1 Like
57

That would be hot.

1 Like
58

flying pencil with thicc engines

what could be better?

1 Like
59

It’s seriously an irreplaceable aircraft. Idk why Boeing doesn’t just make a more efficient one. They don’t need more range, just an efficient aircraft

1 Like
60

yes

Mr. David Calhoun should come here lol

61

The 757 issue is age. Not range. If they just make it more efficient it’ll be fine
ITS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE :man_facepalming:

1 Like
62

Expenses. It’s too much to create a new design, restart the production line, and training (no chance they’re getting away with saying “we don’t need to retrain pilots”).

A NMA would be so much easier.

Coby explains it well here.

1 Like