NEO vs. MAX battlefield

Aviation Games Debating
145

Exactly

1 Like
146

not to be pro-NEO or anything, but PDX-KEF is 3300nm, XLR’s range is 4700nm…

1 Like
147

That’s why the Boeing NMA will be the next 757, and the MAX is just a replacement for older NG series aircraft

1 Like
148

Maybe I’m thinking about SFO then.
Because they flew the 767 but they could fly the 757 if they wanted to

1 Like
149

they actually did fly the 752 to SFO a few times (saw it on FR24)

2 Likes
150

Anyways it doesn’t really matter because the 757 is a much larger aircraft and more comfortable to fly in. Plus the double tandem landing gear is butter

3 Likes
151

A321XLR cant do that

1 Like
152

Yeah the XLR can only fly IAH-KEF (for the general range. thats what their map shows)

2 Likes
153

and very uncomfortably

1 Like
154

Speaking of Icelandair…

image
image1024×678 37.6 KB

(Airlinesfleet)

3 Likes
155

beauty

156

Ugly :face_vomiting:

157

A320neo fat

158

Your a liar.

159

A320 FAT

160

btw wrong spelling

2 Likes
161

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::clap::rofl::rofl::rofl::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap:
You’re finally catching on!

162

The XLR has 4700nm of range. The 757 only has about 3500nm. I don’t know what made you think that the 757 had more. The normal 321neo has as much range as the 757.

1 Like
163

Actually only the XLR has more range. The 757 range is more than the NEO with about 4,500nm in range

1 Like
164

The 757 does not have 4500nm of range.

20210421_103707
20210421_1037071361×1237 180 KB

I was slightly off with the claim that the normal neo having more than the 757, but both the LR and XLR have more range than the 757.

1 Like