NEO vs. MAX battlefield

How is that? Because only one of those applies to the 757? Lol

1 Like

Literally none of them apply to the 757, they stretched it once and nothing else!

2 Likes

I wonder what the neo would look like with fence tips, and the max with just regular winglets

1 Like

That’s an image

1 Like

And then the A220 and E190 winglets switched

1 Like

Because you don’t know when to be quiet.

If it wasn’t for Boeing making the cockpits bigger on the MAX, I would’ve gone with the NEO

I genuinely prefer the older ones (that are still mostly used on 737s)

1 Like

Explain

1 Like

Same here (i mean look my pfp lol)

1 Like

757 >A321

2 Likes

737 Classic, NG and MAX: nervous sweating
What you just described was how literally all 737 variants after the -200 came to be.

1 Like

Well you see, Boeing has never marketed the aircraft as a middle market aircraft, they’ve always kept it in the short haul sector, what are 737-MAXs designed to replace according to Boeing? Other 737s and A320s. What does the A321XLR replace according to Airbus? The 757, which simply doesn’t work

2 Likes

A321 competing with 757 makes 0 sense

2 Likes

What about the MAX 10? How many seats does that hold compared to the 752?

737MAX-10 : Dense short haul
757 : Long haul, with less load

2 Likes

Grazias

1 Like

That’s why I only quoted the take, stretch and add engines bit. They haven’t marketed it as a mid-sized aircraft it can fill the lower end of that sector with range to easily fly trans-Atlantic. On the passenger side of things, no, it’s not a mid-market aircraft.

2 Likes

Yeah. Last I checked the A321NEO or XLR can’t fly from Portland to Keflavik

3 Likes

while the 757 can

1 Like