6/2(1+2)
ok so
6/2(3)
this is not a parenthesis itâs just 2 x 3 without the x
so
3(3)
9
I was about to post that
He says both is correct
historical usage blah blah
1 is correct pre-1917 and 9 is correct post-1917
cmon we are in 2021 not 1916
He shows both methods
So he doesnât lose viewer retention rate by favouring one
well, one is up-to-date and the other is outdated
Tell that to my teachers from year 3
yeah sure
I had a joke about China but I forgot it
âMiss Smith your math teaching methods are outdated, by nearly 100 yearsâ
âYouâre no longer in my class so get the frick outâ
Iâm not ur student so u cant do that
Just like how China wants everyone to forget about the certain square in Beijing, June 4 1989
As a opening gift for this thread, what is 8á2(2+2)?
Itâs 16 (donât @ me)
No because you have to multiply before you divide.
No, multiplication and division are equivalents
That is, unless you agree with math from 100+ years ago