Classic Aviation Debate

EVERY YEAR ONE OF THE 2 LAST B-29s GOES TO CHINO AND YOU CAN FLY IN THEM!!!

Hopefully I can do that next year.

Boeing B-29 Superfortress

That takeoff at around 1:30 :grimacing:

1 Like

1:18 as well

2 Likes

Surprisingly not powered by P&W :joy:

1 Like

it was some crappy wright engine iirc

Yeah it was Wright

Not crappy though.

They made almost 4,000 B-29s, and just because the engines needed a lot of maintenance didn’t mean they were necessarily bad. I’m not saying they didn’t have their issues.

Though it was 1945 and the technology just wasn’t there for the demand they put the aircraft through. It was a heavy bomber after all.

Maybe it would’ve been better for P&Ws to be used :joy:

1 Like

idk man, if your priority has to be to gain speed instead of altitude to prevent the engine from overheating, I’d say it’s say it’s a crappy engine

2 Likes

Yet they did have the technology for the advanced systems used for firing. Quite advanced for 1945.

So I don’t know. Maybe they didn’t build an engine tough enough. Could’ve worked for lighter aircraft. I’d have to research more.

1 Like

That’s why you use Pratt & Whitney

1 Like

ā€œDependableā€ engines

Good slogan back in the day, not so much nowadays :joy:

1 Like

How is it not?
Doing better than RR that’s for sure.

And GE just likes to bribe people. There I said it.

1 Like

How so?

huh?

787 go brrrt

To get people to use their engines

That’ll really trigger @KTJ_Mitchell

777 and A220 with PWs go brrr as well

Who exactly?

1 Like

Truce

777 P&W and 787 RR were both grounded until the issue could be fixed :joy:

Idk. Sounds like something they would do though. And it wouldn’t surprise me.
Take a play right out of Airbus’ playbook am I right

If you can’t prove it happened, it didn’t happen

Also, last time I checked, none of Airbus’ most recent planes (besides the A320neo family) have GE engines…

Yes. Be a good government servant.

So I guess the ā€œPratt & Whitney have no customer baseā€ lie is a dead argument now.