@Californian_Aviator @KTJ_Mitchell
Iâve watched that video twice
Just call this the 757-9 lol
Itâs the 797
No the 797 will be like the 767
They said 2-3-2 is planned
I mean think: New Avionics, Carbon Fiber Body, 787 wings, AT winglets, new enginesâŚ757-X!
We might see the 767-100x replacing the 757-200
But Calhoun said last month NarrowbodyâŚ
No thanks
Keep it the 757
Why does everyone say the 767 doesnât have a replacement?
because it doesnât. simple.
They said 757 and 767 mixed tho
Idk I rather not have a 797
What is the 787-8? a -300 replacement. What is the 787-9? a -400 replacement
They are thinking of remaking the -400
Itd make more sense for the -300 since there are other planes similar to the -400 capacity
except that they are slightly bigger and have far too much range? not a true replacement imo
The 788 has more seats than the -300 tho
And needs more space and runway
787 competes with A330neo and replace A330, not 767.
Next Decade will be chaos
so they can repeat the same story as the original? The -400 literally came into the range of their more succesful type: the 772. If they did it today they would do the same thing but with the 787-8/9