Even better. If it’s the 1s the 739 is using 1R, but that Sam Chui video (A339), the plane only used about half of 1R.
1 Like
Boeing really just wanted to compete with the A340-300 and the Il-86
I mean if an A339 flying out to Portugal can outperform a 739 doing short to mid hauls, it’s really underpowered.
1 Like
the big problem of the -900 is that it can barely pull up before tailstriking, not underpower tbh
The last time I tried using the Alaska 739 on SFO 1L, it literally took off with inches to spare.
1 Like
A321 has a similar problem but its engines are way more powerful (not NEO).
110-120kN vs 133-147kN
1 Like
No joke, I double checked wikipedia
1 Like
trying to takeoff a fully loaded -900 from SBSP, what could go wrong? 
1 Like
And the irony is, the short field packages are fitted on the 739s and still they perform badly
1 Like
IF being stupid again, still no 3D KMCO or KMIA 
1 Like
videos coming out in like 5 minutes or less
do u want a fully loaded 752?
1 Like
Yes considering that they added Latin American airports and KMIA is an important origin for those flights
1 Like
Fully loaded 752 vs fully loaded 739 please 
1 Like
There’s also an A321 btw
1 Like
Yes even better
1 Like
oh I had to takeoff with flaps 10 on the -900 and flaps 1 on the A321
No do flap 5
It’s a fair test that way, both are minimum flap settings
1 Like
If I did flap 5 I’d overrun (ur gonna see soon)
1 Like
Ok let’s see
1 Like
757 here we go!