*733, 734, 735
Around the same time
2 Likes
It was designed against the 733 and 734.
1 Like
Well what, a whole bunch of engineers go to work everyday and sit around doing nothing?
2 Likes
That was the A320-100 shorter range
Then the -200 that went against 738
2 Likes
They say focus 737 Max and 787 and 777x
1 Like
A post was merged into an existing topic: Fun facts about aviation
u guys are so dumb they’re trying to decide what comes after the 797
2 Likes
Correction: Replace the 732
1 Like
807
But that sounds awfully weird because everyone is used to 60+ years of 7x7
1 Like
7107 (seven-ten-seven)
1 Like
Replaces, sort of. Most airlines used it to replace the 727. It competed with the 733 and 734 though.
1 Like
That was what 733 and 735 was supposed to do 
And as I said A320-200 clearly went against 737-800
1 Like
Both are short haul still
1 Like
westjet 737-700 canada to uk
1 Like
Mid haul. The 733, 4 and 5 could comfortably fly transcon.
1 Like
A320-200 - 737-800
A319-100 - 737-700
A318-100 - 737-600
A321-200 - 737-900ER
A320neo - 737MAX 8
A319neo - 737MAX 7
A321neo - 737MAX 9 and kinda 757-200
A321LR - 757-200
A321XLR - mini 747-100, long range 757
1 Like
Yes you’re right
1 Like
Okay, from literally the farthest east you can go in Canada before you hit the Atlantic Ocean to London. A transcontinental flight from JFK-LAX is longer!
2 Likes