md-80 sucks
its just a big heap of loud garbage tbf
@anon5856544 how can we kill this peasant?
1 Like
you cant 
No
The MD-88 is the same as the 81, 82, and 83
It’s only an updated cockpit. That’s all that’s different
yeah
and maybe updated engines
Only the -87 and -90 are different in terms of capacity
Idk why it looks like the -88 is also though
List of Airbus failures:
A318 (too small, too heavy to be considered an RJ, high seat mile costs)
A319neo (we’ll have to wait since it’s somewhat new)
A330-800 (we’ll have to see about that one though since it’s fairly new.)
A340-200
A340-500 (too much range for most airlines, too inneficient (better off with a -300))
A340-600
A380 (too big.)
List of Boeing failures:
717-200 (didnt sell enough)
737-100 (the 200 was far more popular.)
737-600 (same issue as the A318)
737-900 (the ER sold much better.)
747SP(?)
747-300
757-300
777-300
777-200LR
yay thanks devin
The 747SP was unique
Just didn’t work out too well
Long range, ETOPS, and lower demand traffic
1 Like
That’s why I put a question mark
If it wasn’t for the A220-300…
No way
The US Navy was going to use the MD-80 as the P-3 replacement (I think the MD-90X version with the prop fans attached to the engines)
They just never got around to doing it
list of mc donnell douglas mistakes
MD-80
MD-81
MD-82
MD-83
MD-87
MD-88
MD-90
Spirit keeping that afloat
Go away 
thats where ur very wrong
1 Like
give me some points other than “ItS loUd”
Look, but if the A223 never existed most of its current operators would have either gone for the MAX-7 or A319neo.
1 Like
Hello ppl