Welcome to my first (official) post on the WFC! Hope you enjoy my love for this community and for MFS (didn’t forget you IF)
———————-
For all you MFS geeks, I will show you an in-depth tour about the actual differences between this jaw-dropping video (https://youtu.be/BgSjTE71Y2g).
To say, first off MFS is incredibly realistic, and looks almost like real life. But today I want to see what big differences there are, and how you can notice them.
The video is of the “Quite Bridge Visual” approach into SFO’s runway 28L
The first one:
There is no windshield wiper in MFS
Number 2:
This one is very complicated ; we first can assume that the grass strip(highlighted in green) is unilateral attached to the transformation of a crosshair to the y-axis. Which is in reference of the slope of said strip.
To make this easier to visualize I added a triangle to show the relation ship between both. The hypotenuse of triagnle is equal to the tan (θ) of the sin (crosshair coordinates)
If we plug-in all the numbers we come with a direct variation of both coming between ,2 degrees (to the horizon)
TL; DR the whole world is skewed by ,02 degrees.
(English is not my first language, so correct me for any wrong math terms.)
Number 3:
Where’s the rocks off the coastline?
Number 4:
Lights shouldn’t be visible form this far (LED specification)
Number 5:
Not enough wood striped, and no rocks on the the beach.
Number 6:
Lights on the arrow should be on the bottom, not in the middle. There are no markings of the previous runway paint.
Thanks you all for viewing!
- Keep making Topics like this
- Stop making Topics like this
Can you find even more? Comment them below.
