You guys consider bikes as public transit?
If you don’t own the bike, yes?
Fair. I guess those rental rack things do exist.
I don’t think you go there every day to play with friends or to hang out
And it should be within walking distance from home
Ok, here’s literally the street in front of my house.
It’s all like there’s a drastic difference between a city of 8mil and a town of 3k.
Is that not just a tuktuk, which is just a smaller and somehow worse taxi?

Is that not just a tuktuk, which is just a smaller and somehow worse taxi?
yes
i hate them more than cars
So… why not just call it a taxi?
they can enter gullies
taxis cant
Anyway, I don’t see a commuter bus doing this anytime soon:
That’s a 40° side hill. A bus would have rolled over.
buses arent even supposed to do that
lets be practical
i dont think anyone does that everyday
No, but you can do that in a car if you want. You can’t do it in a bus, especially as a passenger.
It might not be an everyday thing, but you can use your car for fun.

No, but you can do that in a car if you want. You can’t do it in a bus, especially as a passenger.
Why would you want to do it?
oh damn thats nice
Why wouldn’t you want to do something fun?
that doesnt look fun to me
it looks like what a chapri (look it up) would do
They may be considered public transportation if you do not own them, but certainly not mass transit.
I found like four different definitions for it, but the one I’m going with (and assuming that you meant) isn’t actually that far off from being accurate about me.