Well, the dreamy in MIA is a common sightđ
1 Like
787- The most fuel efficient widebody aircraft, new composites, cool wing, modern interior, modern cockpit, efficient engines
A330neo- New engines and winglets, take it or leave it
2 Likes
Iâll take it
1 Like
iâll take 787
bc i dont want my dreams to crashâŚ
and also 787 and 777 are better than any Airbus widebody, except the A340 ofcourse
A340-300 is unmatched and unique
Idc about the other variants though 
1 Like
Thatâs so cool! Iâve even gotten a model of that!
The B788 is cute. The B789 is the best. The B78X ainât it.
But all of them ended the A330neo, itâs obvious.
(Iâm only supporting/liking the B777-300ER (and B789) in the Boeing company but I had to say it).
Damn the delusion is real. Go check the A350, the A330neo isnât the only Airbus representative
2 Likes
8 posts were merged into an existing topic: Airbus or Boeing?
Yes 787-10 is⌠wellâŚ
Range for its size is no good
So why choose 78X when you have similar capacity but longer range planes like A359 etc
And A330neo good even it wasnât the best seller
2 Likes
the 78X is more efficient than the A359 on shorter routes
But less flexibility, the thing with the A359 is that it can fly anywhere from below 2h short hops to 15+ hours flight
Useful for airlines with high short and long haul demand.
2 Likes
yes
but as a Boeing simp, I choose the 78X
1 Like
see, the thing is an airline might have shorter routes with a big demand and not so demanding long routes, thus making have the 789 and the 78X ideal
itâs not every route that requires a 300-seater A359, thus resulting in less profit for said airline
78X actually has a few more seats
So if less demand 78X not so good either
together with cheaper operation costs = more profit
use the 789 then
Singapore only has 78X though
And it is backtracking on it
1 Like
guess what itâs ordering instead? big boi aka 777-9
1 Like
Yâall I was talking in term of beauty , the B789 looks WAAAAAYYYY better
2 Likes