World Flying Community Off-Topic Discussion (Part 9)

5394

I really hope it doesn’t replace the A320neo

1 Like
5395

And in the northwest livery :heart_eyes:

1 Like
5396

Why do you guys keep using the IATA things

5397

Like B7M9 or whatever that code is

1 Like
5398

Like bruh you can just say max 9

1 Like
5399

I doubt it will. The chances of Airbus actually going through with a BCS5 is very low. No one wanted the A319neo, so it wasn’t a big deal for them to compete with themselves there, but the A20N has too many sales for them to compete internally.

2 Likes
5401

They wouldn’t be dumb enough to make a plane just for DAL, AF and AirBaltic

…or would they?

4 Likes
5403

I mean, they could, and I guess I’d support it, but I doubt it will happen.

1 Like
5404

No, the ICAO is B39M

1 Like
5405

That’s unusual. Like B39M is quite different from Max 9. Though I get the idea.

1 Like
5406

The A320neo is still better though

1 Like
5407

I mean the 7 is kinda unecessary, so yeah it’s the (7)39 but MAX

1 Like
5408

But I like the MAX better than the neo. So, a competitor to the neo is fine by me.

2 Likes
5409

That’s literally what the MAX is…

2 Likes
5410

Ok, something to internally replace the neo.

1 Like
5411

I really hope Airbus makes the A220-500 and the A220neo

so Boeing’s cleansheet 737 replacement destroys the A220 in every way :grinning_face_with_smiling_eyes:

5412

I wouldn’t mind since it’s the A220

1 Like
5413

I mean it isn’t even an Airbus :joy:

1 Like
5414

I’d like to see both exist. As long as the A320neo gets destroyed, I’m happy. The point of the CS is supposed to fill the gap between RJ and full sized, not to be a full blown main line jet.

1 Like
5415

and that’s exactly what the BCS5 is trying to be