World Flying Community Off-Topic Discussion (Part 7)

No
That’s where you’re wrong :joy:

1 Like

No. Never.

A346 is kinda ugly

1 Like

You may as well call the 753 ugly then

1 Like

But it’s not

1 Like

It’s not beautiful

1 Like

So can you call the DC-8-71/73 ugly

Why you always gotta compare Airbus to Boeing?

Just accept that I like certain Airbus over other ones

1 Like

A318: baby
A319: cute
A320: just right
A321: a bit long but ok

1 Like

B707: great
B720: still great, kinda not needed tho

1 Like

777-200: a bit short

777-200LR: the wannabe 777-300ER with a 772 fuselage

777-300: totally not needed

777-300ER: what a 777 is supposed to look like

1 Like

Ignores 777-200ER

1 Like

772: Perfect
77L: Cute
773: ew
77W: ok

Boeing has made so many 777 variants :joy:

1 Like

It look the same as the -200 and is classifued as 772

what
no
77W better

1 Like

Different planes still

1 Like

Yes
Of course

1 Like

737: Am I a joke to u?

We’re not talking about that
Plus those are different enough to make since

1 Like