I agree with this Guy!
2 Likes
Tbh winglets look great on planes like the 757 but look really bad on aircraft like the A320 family.
Well, it varies from plane to plane for me, so here is a list for the ones that have/had the option for winglets:
Boeing Aircraft
- 727: No
- 737: If it’s the NG split, then definitely no
- 747: Maybe?
- 757: on the -200, maybe. On the -300, yes
- 767: No
Airbus
- A318: No (the triangle wingtip looks good tho)
- A319: No (same as above)
- A320: No (same as A318)
- A321: Yes and No
Embraer
- E145: No
2 Likes
I don’t think you understand what he use the winglets…
This has left me on a ‘cliffhanger’ if you must. Anything to add? Winglets or no winglets or I am just confused tbh…
Here’s my thoughts:
Airbus
A318 - No
A319 - No
A320 - Yes
A321 - Yes
Boeing
727 - Why would you?
737 - Splits only. Normal winglets are ugly
747 - Yes
757 - Only -300s. -200 winglets are worse than -300 winglets
767 - The -300 is the only one that looks good with winglets
also sorry for bumping
1 Like
The MAX splits aren’t bad, but the split on the NG is 
3 Likes
Winglet lives matter! I am starting Antibarewingfa
Rip early Boeing models
1 Like
we also have to abolish the Neo Bare wings and the WWW (winglets wage war)
these are both horrible groups. (yes i am making fun of real groups)
@PlanesAndGames, I know you like the 737-200. You should photoshop some NG winglets on to it to prove that some planes are awful with winglets.
wait hold up… there were some -200s with mini winglets. they look awful 
.
i’m team no winglet btw
1 Like
Depends
wdym
When the topic blows up again
agreed.
Winglets look cheap on some aircraft though
Imo, I prefer both, it doesn’t really matters to me.
thas ugly.
1 Like