much better than a gaming setup
…
So you would prefer to have a lamp that doesn’t work over a high tech gaming PC? Something doesn’t add up here
I love the E2 as much as the A220, but you just aren’t making sense lol
I’d just like to point out the fact that these two cockpits are quite similar apart from the yoke/stick. So I don’t believe calling the A220 a gaming PC is completely accurate, especially when you consider that the E2 cockpit is literally showing a simulation of the outside world on the PFD.
1 Like
Imagine not getting jokes
1 Like
Impossible
this is easy
indeed. E2 ofc 
1 Like
nah a220
A220 has higher average range (1121nm more than the E2 average).
A220 Range
A220-100: 3450nm
A220-300: 3798nm
AVG: 3624nm
E2 Range
E175E2: 2060nm
E190E2: 2850nm
E195E2: 2600nm
AVG: 2503nm
3 Likes
The last one is also divided by 3, not 2 unlike the A220
Simple math would always say anything divided by 2 is greater than 3 
-9/2 is smaller than -9/3…
But yes, and also the longest range E2 has a shorter range A220, however range and size aren’t everything though
Since when are we talking negatives 
Well they are both regionals
They aren’t gong to fly it to its furthest capabilities 
They’d fly a larger plane
1 Like
Thus meaning the A220 is deoptimized for the shorter routes and too heavy. The E2 is just right.
Revival time. The CSeries is better than the E2, and that is a fact.
It will forever be the A220.
1 Like
Call it what you want, the ICAO is still BCS1 and BCS3.
1 Like
A221 and A223 in my eyes.
1 Like
According to you? Yes. According to international governing bodies? No.
1 Like